Article for EQ Review “Youth Livelihoods”
Eastern Europe and Eurasia Social Legacy Program (SLP)
Article for EQ Review “Youth Livelihoods”
Graduates from corrupt higher education institutions (HEIs) frequently have fewer chances of entering the labor market and/or keeping a job than their peers who graduate from non-corrupt universities. Corrupt HEIs often produce graduates whose professional levels and skills are behind the minimal standards thus resulting in a bad reputation of the HEIs among employers. In some cases, the lack of skills by graduates may pose a risk to the public, especially in fields like medicine, law, and others.
Defined as ‘the misuse of public office for private gain[1],’ corruption is a complex issue and a practice in many countries across the world. Corruption in education, of all sectors, may have the most detrimental impact on society for it involves children and youth and because education models shapes behaviors of future citizens.
In Eastern Europe and Eurasia (E&E), corruption in education is extensive and its impact on these countries’ youth and workforce development is still trying to be determined by the experts. Heyneman et al argue that this region is particularly vulnerable because “decentralization and privatization [in education] did not reduce bribe taking but may have significantly increased it. The increase was particularly rapid if international competition from private education providers was restricted. The quality of education was likely to deteriorate during this phase because individual rent-seeking behavior by agents increased.[2]”
USAID’s TAPEE Framework[3] breaks down the levels in which corruption in education takes place and provides specific examples under each:
Level: Ministry of Education
Examples: Diverting funds from government accounts or international assistance projects; bribes/kickbacks on construction, supply, publishing contracts; nepotism
Level: Region/District
Examples: Overlooking school violations; favoritism in appointment / promotion decisions (school directors, teachers)
Level: School
Examples: Diversion of central MOE school funds; diversion of community contributions
Level: Classroom/Teacher
Examples: Selling grades and test scores; grade-to-grade promotion; diverting school supplies and textbooks to market
Level: University
Examples: Selling entrance exams; selling course and exam grades; corrupt systems of accreditation
USAID’s E&E Social Legacy Program, implemented by Education Development Center (EDC), has created the Transparent Education Network (TEN) to bring together key individuals and organizations from the region to foster peer-to-peer collaboration and dialogue, share best practices, challenges and resources in this field. TEN’s goals are to: a) raise awareness about corruption in education and its impact on society; b) strengthen local capacity to analyze the effects of corruption; c) promote a culture of transparency and accountability in tertiary-level schools.
To accomplish these goals, EDC is working with local organizations in the region, including: NGO Center (Armenia); YUVA (Azerbaijan), Youth Education Forum (Macedonia). TEN is conducting community-based / student-led awareness raising activities in order to help all key stakeholders understand the impact of corruption in education in all levels including its effects on graduates’ employment opportunities. Further, TEN, in coordination with universities, is working to develop codes of conduct for students, faculty, and staff as a way to promote accountability and transparency, at the school level.
It is expected that TEN members work closely with business representatives and other employers to endorse the efforts of universities that are taking action in the fight against corruption in education and help students understand how their employment prospects can improve upon more transparent education systems.
[1] World Bank, Distance Learning Program “Youth for Good Governance,” Module III: Introduction to Corruption
[2] Heyneman, Anderson, and Nurilayeva, The Cost of Corruption in Higher Education, November 2007, Comparative Education Review, vol. 52, no. 1
[3] USAID E&E Bureau Anti-corruption Working Group, TAPEE (Transparency, Accountability, Prevention, Enforcement, Education) Framework for Combating Corruption and Promoting Integrity in the Europe and Eurasia Region, August 2005